Message-Id: <20230430171809.124686-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 30 Apr 2023 10:18:01 -0700
From:   Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@...el.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro

for_each_cpu() is widely used in kernel, and it's beneficial to create
a NUMA-aware version of the macro.

Recently added for_each_numa_hop_mask() works, but switching existing
codebase to it is not an easy process.

This series adds for_each_numa_cpu(), which is designed to be similar to
the for_each_cpu(). It allows to convert existing code to NUMA-aware as
simple as adding a hop iterator variable and passing it inside new macro.
for_each_numa_cpu() takes care of the rest.

At the moment, we have 2 users of NUMA-aware enumerators. One is
Melanox's in-tree driver, and another is Intel's in-review driver:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230216145455.661709-1-pawel.chmielewski@intel.com/

Both real-life examples follow the same pattern:

        for_each_numa_hop_mask(cpus, prev, node) {
                for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, cpus, prev) {
                        if (cnt++ == max_num)
                                goto out;
                        do_something(cpu);
                }
                prev = cpus;
        }

With the new macro, it has a more standard look, like this:

        for_each_numa_cpu(cpu, hop, node, cpu_possible_mask) {
                if (cnt++ == max_num)
                        break;
                do_something(cpu);
        }

Straight conversion of existing for_each_cpu() codebase to NUMA-aware
version with for_each_numa_hop_mask() is difficult because it doesn't
take a user-provided cpu mask, and eventually ends up with open-coded
double loop. With for_each_numa_cpu() it shouldn't be a brainteaser.
Consider the NUMA-ignorant example:

        cpumask_t cpus = get_mask();
        int cnt = 0, cpu;

        for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
                if (cnt++ == max_num)
                        break;
                do_something(cpu);
        }

Converting it to NUMA-aware version would be as simple as:

        cpumask_t cpus = get_mask();
        int node = get_node();
        int cnt = 0, hop, cpu;

        for_each_numa_cpu(cpu, hop, node, cpus) {
                if (cnt++ == max_num)
                        break;
                do_something(cpu);
        }

The latter looks more verbose and avoids from open-coding that annoying
double loop. Another advantage is that it works with a 'hop' parameter with
the clear meaning of NUMA distance, and doesn't make people not familiar
to enumerator internals bothering with current and previous masks machinery.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZD3l6FBnUh9vTIGc@yury-ThinkPad/T/
v3:
 - fix sched_numa_find_{next,nth}_cpu() when CONFIG_NUMA is off to
   only traverse online CPUs;
 - don't export sched_domains_numa_levels for testing purposes. In
   the test, use for_each_node() macro;
 - extend the test for for_each_node();
 - in comments, mention that only online CPUs are traversed;
 - rebase on top of 6.3. 

Yury Norov (8):
  sched: fix sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() in non-NUMA case
  lib/find: add find_next_and_andnot_bit()
  sched/topology: introduce sched_numa_find_next_cpu()
  sched/topology: add for_each_numa_{,online}_cpu() macro
  net: mlx5: switch comp_irqs_request() to using for_each_numa_cpu
  lib/cpumask: update comment to cpumask_local_spread()
  sched: drop for_each_numa_hop_mask()
  lib: test for_each_numa_cpus()

 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 16 ++---
 include/linux/find.h                         | 43 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/topology.h                     | 40 ++++++-----
 kernel/sched/topology.c                      | 53 ++++++++-------
 lib/cpumask.c                                |  7 +-
 lib/find_bit.c                               | 12 ++++
 lib/test_bitmap.c                            | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-
 7 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists