[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZE4TU0rCw9MSwrmB@sai>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 09:05:55 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"A. Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: lpi2c: cache peripheral clock rate
> > IIRC this is a general problem^w limitation of the clock framework,
> > clock providers cannot use clocks themselves in certain callback, e.g.
> > set_rate.
>
> Well, that's essentially impossible when this clock provider is attached via
> i2c. i2c transfers potentially need to change or prepare clocks.
So, as I get it, this is not a specific lpi2c problem but affecting any
I2C controller driver which uses get_rate() to setup a transfer to a
remote I2C clock provider? And this lockdep warning is a false-positive?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists