[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c216a2e-2f97-b6f9-bf09-67b85e932322@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 11:31:37 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, markgross@...nel.org
Cc: Mario.Limonciello@....com, prasanth.ksr@...l.com,
jorgealtxwork@...il.com, james@...iv.tech,
Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: wmi: Allow retrieving the number of WMI
object instances
Hi,
On 4/30/23 23:01, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.04.23 um 22:41 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>
>> Hi Armin,
>>
>> On 4/30/23 22:31, Armin Wolf wrote:
>>> Currently, the WMI driver core knows how many instances of a given
>>> WMI object exist, but WMI drivers cannot access this information.
>>> At the same time, some current and upcoming WMI drivers want to
>>> have access to this information. Add wmi_instance_count() and
>>> wmidev_instance_count() to allow WMI drivers to get the number of
>>> WMI object instances.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
>> Thank you for your work on this.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
>>> include/linux/wmi.h | 2 ++
>>> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
>>> index c226dd4163a1..5b95d7aa5c2f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
>>> @@ -263,6 +263,47 @@ int set_required_buffer_size(struct wmi_device *wdev, u64 length)
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_required_buffer_size);
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * wmi_instance_count - Get number of WMI object instances
>>> + * @guid_string: 36 char string of the form fa50ff2b-f2e8-45de-83fa-65417f2f49ba
>>> + *
>>> + * Get the number of WMI object instances.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns: Number of WMI object instances or negative error code.
>>> + */
>>> +int wmi_instance_count(const char *guid_string)
>>> +{
>>> + struct wmi_block *wblock;
>>> + acpi_status status;
>>> +
>>> + status = find_guid(guid_string, &wblock);
>>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>> + if (status == AE_BAD_PARAMETER)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>> Maybe just return 0 here ?
>>
>> The GUID not existing at all does not seem like
>> an error to me, but rather a case of there
>> being 0 instances.
>>
>> This will also allow patch 2/2 to completely
>> drop the get_instance_count() function and
>> replace its callers with direct calls to
>> wmi_instance_count() as the code is known
>> to always pass a valid GUID, so it won't hit
>> the -EINVAL path.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
> Hi,
>
> i would prefer returning -ENODEV instead of 0, so WMI drivers can
> distinguish between "not found" and "zero instances".
Ah right, that is a good point, ok lets keep this as is then.
Regards,
Hans
> Also i do not
> think that relying on the parameter of get_instance_count() always
> being a valid GUID is a good idea, just in case wmi_instance_count()
> is later modified to be able to encounter runtime errors.
>
> Armin Wolf
>
>>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return wmidev_instance_count(&wblock->dev);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmi_instance_count);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * wmidev_instance_count - Get number of WMI object instances
>>> + * @wdev: A wmi bus device from a driver
>>> + *
>>> + * Get the number of WMI object instances.
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns: Number of WMI object instances.
>>> + */
>>> +u8 wmidev_instance_count(struct wmi_device *wdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct wmi_block *wblock = container_of(wdev, struct wmi_block, dev);
>>> +
>>> + return wblock->gblock.instance_count;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wmidev_instance_count);
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * wmi_evaluate_method - Evaluate a WMI method (deprecated)
>>> * @guid_string: 36 char string of the form fa50ff2b-f2e8-45de-83fa-65417f2f49ba
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
>>> index efff750f326d..e52bf2742eaf 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
>>> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ extern bool acpi_is_pnp_device(struct acpi_device *);
>>>
>>> typedef void (*wmi_notify_handler) (u32 value, void *context);
>>>
>>> +int wmi_instance_count(const char *guid);
>>> +
>>> extern acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid, u8 instance,
>>> u32 method_id,
>>> const struct acpi_buffer *in,
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h
>>> index c1a3bd4e4838..763bd382cf2d 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/wmi.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/wmi.h
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern acpi_status wmidev_evaluate_method(struct wmi_device *wdev,
>>> extern union acpi_object *wmidev_block_query(struct wmi_device *wdev,
>>> u8 instance);
>>>
>>> +u8 wmidev_instance_count(struct wmi_device *wdev);
>>> +
>>> extern int set_required_buffer_size(struct wmi_device *wdev, u64 length);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> --
>>> 2.30.2
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists