[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9633b9b-c39f-699a-4b05-1c0c55e2dec9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 17:51:20 +0800
From: Tuo Li <islituo@...il.com>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
baijiaju1990@...look.com
Subject: Re: [BUG][RESEND] Bluetooth: L2CAP: possible data race in
__sco_sock_close()
Thanks for your reply and interests. Our static analysis tool is still
to be improved, and any feedback on it would be appreciated.
On 2023/4/29 5:24, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 3:27 AM Li Tuo <islituo@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Our static analysis tool finds a possible data race in the l2cap protocol
>> in Linux 6.3.0-rc7:
>>
>> In most calling contexts, the variable sk->sk_socket is accessed
>> with holding the lock sk->sk_callback_lock. Here is an example:
>>
>> l2cap_sock_accept() --> Line 346 in net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> bt_accept_dequeue() --> Line 368 in net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> sock_graft() --> Line 240 in net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
>> write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock); --> Line 2081 in include/net/sock.h (Lock sk->sk_callback_lock)
>> sk_set_socket() --> Line 2084 in include/net/sock.h
>> sk->sk_socket = sock; --> Line 2054 in include/net/sock.h (Access sk->sk_socket)
>>
>> However, in the following calling context:
>>
>> sco_sock_shutdown() --> Line 1227 in net/bluetooth/sco.c
>> __sco_sock_close() --> Line 1243 in net/bluetooth/sco.c
>> BT_DBG(..., sk->sk_socket); --> Line 431 in net/bluetooth/sco.c (Access sk->sk_socket)
>>
>> the variable sk->sk_socket is accessed without holding the lock
>> sk->sk_callback_lock, and thus a data race may occur.
>>
>> Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@...a.edu.cn>
> Need to check in detail what it means to hold the sk_callback_lock,
> btw is this static analysis tool of yours something public that we can
> use in our CI to detect these problems?
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists