[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2c2308a-729a-ec18-18e7-36d00b25207d@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 23:05:35 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hughd@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot <syzbot+702361cf7e3d95758761@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in generic_fillattr / shmem_mknod
(2)
On 2023/05/01 14:15, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hmm, where is the serialization that avoids concurrent
> shmem_mknod()/shmem_mknod() or shmem_mknod()/shmem_unlink() ?
> i_size_write() says "need locking around it (normally i_mutex)"...
>
Since filename_create() calls inode_lock_nested(path->dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT)
and done_path_create() calls inode_unlock(path->dentry->d_inode), serialization looks OK.
Just the name is no longer i_mutex ?
> Also, there was a similar report on updating i_{ctime,mtime} to current_time()
> which means that i_size is not the only field that is causing data race.
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=067d40ab9ab23a6fa0a8156857ed54e295062a29
Do we want to as well wrap i_{ctime,mtime} using data_race() ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists