[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83fd1a29-3af2-e2b7-02ea-edbaead8103a@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 13:36:14 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
John Allen <john.allen@....com>
Cc: David S Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] crypto: ccp: Rename macro for security
attributes
On 4/28/23 13:55, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The attribute_show() macro is only valid for determining the availability
> of security related sysfs entries. Rename the macro to better show this
> relationship.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> index aa15bc4cac2b..85e3dc8853e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct sp_pci {
> };
> static struct sp_device *sp_dev_master;
>
> -#define attribute_show(name, def) \
> +#define security_attribute_show(name, def) \
> static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr, \
> char *buf) \
> { \
> @@ -42,24 +42,24 @@ static ssize_t name##_show(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr, \
> return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (psp->capability & bit) > 0); \
> }
>
> -attribute_show(fused_part, FUSED_PART)
> +security_attribute_show(fused_part, FUSED_PART)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(fused_part);
> -attribute_show(debug_lock_on, DEBUG_LOCK_ON)
> +security_attribute_show(debug_lock_on, DEBUG_LOCK_ON)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_lock_on);
> -attribute_show(tsme_status, TSME_STATUS)
> +security_attribute_show(tsme_status, TSME_STATUS)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(tsme_status);
> -attribute_show(anti_rollback_status, ANTI_ROLLBACK_STATUS)
> +security_attribute_show(anti_rollback_status, ANTI_ROLLBACK_STATUS)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(anti_rollback_status);
> -attribute_show(rpmc_production_enabled, RPMC_PRODUCTION_ENABLED)
> +security_attribute_show(rpmc_production_enabled, RPMC_PRODUCTION_ENABLED)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpmc_production_enabled);
> -attribute_show(rpmc_spirom_available, RPMC_SPIROM_AVAILABLE)
> +security_attribute_show(rpmc_spirom_available, RPMC_SPIROM_AVAILABLE)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpmc_spirom_available);
> -attribute_show(hsp_tpm_available, HSP_TPM_AVAILABLE)
> +security_attribute_show(hsp_tpm_available, HSP_TPM_AVAILABLE)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hsp_tpm_available);
> -attribute_show(rom_armor_enforced, ROM_ARMOR_ENFORCED)
> +security_attribute_show(rom_armor_enforced, ROM_ARMOR_ENFORCED)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rom_armor_enforced);
>
> -static struct attribute *psp_attrs[] = {
> +static struct attribute *psp_security_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_fused_part.attr,
> &dev_attr_debug_lock_on.attr,
> &dev_attr_tsme_status.attr,
> @@ -83,13 +83,13 @@ static umode_t psp_security_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct attribute_group psp_attr_group = {
> - .attrs = psp_attrs,
> +static struct attribute_group psp_security_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = psp_security_attrs,
> .is_visible = psp_security_is_visible,
> };
>
> static const struct attribute_group *psp_groups[] = {
> - &psp_attr_group,
> + &psp_security_attr_group,
> NULL,
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists