[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230501185955.GA604757@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 14:59:55 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: syzbot <syzbot+18b2ab4c697021ee8369@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in do_truncate (2)
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:03:09PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot suspects this issue was fixed by commit:
>
> commit dfefd226b0bf7c435a58d75a0ce2f9273b9825f6
> Author: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 15 03:15:03 2020 +0000
>
> mm: cleanup kstrto*() usage
This is a nonsense bisect result; I've filed a bug against syzbot[1].
[1] https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/3855
Looking more closely at this reproducer, it looks like it is setting
up a and configuring userfaultd on a large number of threads:
clone(child_stack=NULL, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0x11ad690)
res = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, 0ul);
syscall(__NR_ioctl, r[0], UFFDIO_API, {api=0xaa, features=0, ... });
syscall(__NR_ioctl, -1, PPPIOCGMRU, 0ul) returns -EBADF
(don't know why the syzbot minimizer didn't get rid of this...)
syscall(__NR_ioctl, r[0], UFFDIO_REGISTER, {range={start=0x20909000, len=0x4000}, mode=UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING ...)
...
It does this in a tight loop, spawning many threads each time, and
while it doesen't always end up reporting an rcu preempt stall, and
locking up the kernel, I have manage to trigger a similar crash when
the underlying file system is btrfs, with the stack traces being
similar. So I don't believe it is an ext4-specific bug.
#syz set subsystems: fs
I'm not an expert on userfaultd, but I'm not at all convinced what
this reproducer is doing is valid and it may be a "root an screw
itself" kind of issue. Maybe someone who knows more about userfaultfd
can comment?
There is a C reproducer[2], but it suffers from the standard
obfuscation via ultra-non-portable-C-so-much-it-might-as- well-be-asm
problem. The syzbot dashboard page for this can be found here[3].
[2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=153a741e100000
[3] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d38f8eae55e27aaef60b4748bc77ecb712dba4b9
Thanks,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists