linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add IDs for IPQ5018 family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOX2RU6wwvMLgScAgtqpOuSLeaULUAet4TtjQZkWK_uwwkr2Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 May 2023 23:22:39 +0200
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add IDs for IPQ5018 family

On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 14:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29.04.2023 21:33, Robert Marko wrote:
> > Add SOC IDs for the IPQ5018 family.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> > index 802495b20276..c1283bad81e1 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> > @@ -216,6 +216,9 @@
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SM8350                       439
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QCM2290                      441
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SM6115                       444
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5010                      446
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5018                      447
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5028                      448
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SC8280XP             449
> >  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ6005                      453
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRB5165                      455
> > @@ -229,6 +232,9 @@
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SM8450_3             482
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SC7280                       487
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SC7180P                      495
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5000                      503
>
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ0509                      504
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ0518                      505
> Are you sure these names are in tact?

Hi,
They should be correct, I am seeing them being used downstream
and in end products as well, IPQ0509 being one of those weird ones
that integrate 256MB of RAM on the die as well.

Regards,
Robert

>
> Konrad
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SM6375                       507
> >  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9514                      510
> >  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9550                      511
> > @@ -236,6 +242,7 @@
> >  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9570                      513
> >  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9574                      514
> >  #define QCOM_ID_SM8550                       519
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5016                      520
> >  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9510                      521
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRB4210                      523
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRB2210                      524
> > @@ -243,6 +250,7 @@
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000                      539
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000                      545
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010                      587
> > +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019                      569
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1032                      588
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1052                      589
> >  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1062                      590