lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230501213349.bvbf6i72eepcd56m@revolver>
Date:   Mon, 1 May 2023 17:33:49 -0400
From:   "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de,
        willy@...radead.org, corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
        nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
        pasha.tatashin@...een.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
        yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
        andreyknvl@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com,
        penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
        glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Noralf Tr�nnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/40] lib/string_helpers: Drop space in
 string_get_size's output

* Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> [230501 15:57]:
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:36 PM Kent Overstreet
> <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 11:13:15AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > On Mon, 01 May 2023, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> > > >
> > > > Previously, string_get_size() outputted a space between the number and
> > > > the units, i.e.
> > > >  9.88 MiB
> > > >
> > > > This changes it to
> > > >  9.88MiB
> > > >
> > > > which allows it to be parsed correctly by the 'sort -h' command.
> 
> But why do we need that? What's the use case?
> 
> > > Wouldn't this break users that already parse it the current way?
> >
> > It's not impossible - but it's not used in very many places and we
> > wouldn't be printing in human-readable units if it was meant to be
> > parsed - it's mainly used for debug output currently.
> >
> > If someone raises a specific objection we'll do something different,
> > otherwise I think standardizing on what userspace tooling already parses
> > is a good idea.
> 
> Yes, I NAK this on the basis of
> https://english.stackexchange.com/a/2911/153144

This fixes the output to be better aligned with:
the output of ls -sh
the input expected by find -size

Are there counter-examples of commands that follow the SI Brochure?

Thanks,
Liam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ