[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <781b8ce2-bc3e-4eef-b466-fc0e26f64bb5@t-8ch.de>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 09:05:29 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: remove LINUX_REBOOT_ constants
On 2023-05-02 08:59:27+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
<snip>
> > The following trivial fix on top of my patch would fix the problem:
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > index 5d624dc63a42..9d27131c224e 100644
> > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <linux/auxvec.h>
> > #include <linux/fcntl.h> // for O_* and AT_*
> > #include <linux/stat.h> // for statx()
> > +#include <linux/reboot.h> // for LINUX_REBOOT_*
> >
> > #include "arch.h"
> > #include "errno.h"
>
> Indeed it works for me as well.
>
> > Want me to send a v2 or will you fix it up on your side?
>
> It depends. If for you it's a fix and needed for 6.4 (or maybe older),
> then that one is needed with the "//" comment, and it will later
> conflict with your previous cleanup patch that's already queued. If
> you're fine with having it queued for 6.5 only however, then I'll just
> edit your patch and add that above. I tend to think the second solution
> is sufficient given that nobody complained till now ;-)
This is absolutely not urgent. 6.5 is fine.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists