[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DUZPR04MB989911E3FEDFF1F6BF28A3438F6F9@DUZPR04MB9899.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 07:19:54 +0000
From: Kshitiz Varshney <kshitiz.varshney@....com>
To: Olivier Bacon <obacon@...etec.com>,
Sylvain Ouellet <souellet@...etec.com>
CC: Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>, Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@....com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] crypto: engine - fix crypto_queue backlog handling
Reviewed-by: Kshitiz Varshney <kshitiz.varshney@....com>
Tested-by: Kshitiz Varshney <kshitiz.varshney@....com>
Thanks & Regards,
Kshitiz
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Bacon <olivierb89@...il.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:31 PM
> To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
> Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Olivier Bacon
> <obacon@...etec.com>; Sylvain Ouellet <souellet@...etec.com>
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH] crypto: engine - fix crypto_queue backlog handling
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG tells the crypto driver that it should
> internally backlog requests until the crypto hw's queue becomes full. At that
> point, crypto_engine backlogs the request and returns -EBUSY. Calling driver
> such as dm-crypt then waits until the
> complete() function is called with a status of -EINPROGRESS before sending a
> new request.
>
> The problem lies in the call to complete() with a value of -EINPROGRESS that is
> made when a backlog item is present on the queue. The call is done before the
> successful execution of the crypto request. In the case that do_one_request()
> returns < 0 and the retry support is available, the request is put back in the queue.
> This leads upper drivers to send a new request even if the queue is still full.
>
> The problem can be reproduced by doing a large dd into a crypto dm-crypt
> device. This is pretty easy to see when using Freescale CAAM crypto driver and
> SWIOTLB dma. Since the actual amount of requests that can be hold in the
> queue is unlimited we get IOs error and dma allocation.
>
> The fix is to call complete with a value of -EINPROGRESS only if the request is
> not enqueued back in crypto_queue. This is done by calling complete() later in
> the code. In order to delay the decision, crypto_queue is modified to correctly
> set the backlog pointer when a request is enqueued back.
>
> Fixes: 6a89f492f8e5 ("crypto: engine - support for parallel requests based on
> retry mechanism")
> Co-developed-by: Sylvain Ouellet <souellet@...etec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Ouellet <souellet@...etec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Bacon <obacon@...etec.com>
> ---
> crypto/algapi.c | 3 +++
> crypto/crypto_engine.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/algapi.c b/crypto/algapi.c index d08f864f08be..18a8ca9cafbc
> 100644
> --- a/crypto/algapi.c
> +++ b/crypto/algapi.c
> @@ -961,6 +961,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_enqueue_request);
> void crypto_enqueue_request_head(struct crypto_queue *queue,
> struct crypto_async_request *request) {
> + if (unlikely(queue->qlen >= queue->max_qlen))
> + queue->backlog = queue->backlog->prev;
> +
> queue->qlen++;
> list_add(&request->list, &queue->list); } diff --git a/crypto/crypto_engine.c
> b/crypto/crypto_engine.c index 21f791615114..74fcc0897041 100644
> --- a/crypto/crypto_engine.c
> +++ b/crypto/crypto_engine.c
> @@ -129,9 +129,6 @@ static void crypto_pump_requests(struct crypto_engine
> *engine,
> if (!engine->retry_support)
> engine->cur_req = async_req;
>
> - if (backlog)
> - crypto_request_complete(backlog, -EINPROGRESS);
> -
> if (engine->busy)
> was_busy = true;
> else
> @@ -217,6 +214,9 @@ static void crypto_pump_requests(struct crypto_engine
> *engine,
> crypto_request_complete(async_req, ret);
>
> retry:
> + if (backlog)
> + crypto_request_complete(backlog, -EINPROGRESS);
> +
> /* If retry mechanism is supported, send new requests to engine */
> if (engine->retry_support) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->queue_lock, flags);
> --
> 2.40.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists