[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFBdobY1yxMXYfFt@google.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 17:47:29 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Input: pwm-vibra - add support for enable GPIO
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:34:28PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Some pwm vibrators have a dedicated enable GPIO that needs to be set
> high so that the vibrator works. Add support for that optionally.
So this is not simply a power supply in your case controlled by a GPIO?
We truly can have both GPIO and a separate regulator?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists