linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add IDs for IPQ5018 family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4bfcbde3-c9e1-65a9-4494-3d9bb222a89f@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 11:51:03 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add IDs for IPQ5018
 family



On 1.05.2023 23:22, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 14:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29.04.2023 21:33, Robert Marko wrote:
>>> Add SOC IDs for the IPQ5018 family.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 8 ++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> index 802495b20276..c1283bad81e1 100644
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> @@ -216,6 +216,9 @@
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SM8350                       439
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QCM2290                      441
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SM6115                       444
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5010                      446
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5018                      447
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5028                      448
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SC8280XP             449
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ6005                      453
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRB5165                      455
>>> @@ -229,6 +232,9 @@
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SM8450_3             482
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SC7280                       487
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SC7180P                      495
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5000                      503
>>
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ0509                      504
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ0518                      505
>> Are you sure these names are in tact?
> 
> Hi,
> They should be correct, I am seeing them being used downstream
> and in end products as well, IPQ0509 being one of those weird ones
> that integrate 256MB of RAM on the die as well.
Hmmm.. it's sketchy and weird-sounding, but also appealing in a way

I got caught off-guard with the leading zeroes, but probably qcom
just didn't want to mess with the IPQabcd scheme!

Konrad
> 
> Regards,
> Robert
> 
>>
>> Konrad
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SM6375                       507
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9514                      510
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9550                      511
>>> @@ -236,6 +242,7 @@
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9570                      513
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9574                      514
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_SM8550                       519
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5016                      520
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_IPQ9510                      521
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRB4210                      523
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRB2210                      524
>>> @@ -243,6 +250,7 @@
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000                      539
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000                      545
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010                      587
>>> +#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019                      569
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1032                      588
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1052                      589
>>>  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1062                      590