[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f51b4dc9-e1da-7c9c-1e39-c8510569db9d@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 12:15:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Stanley Chang[昌育德]
<stanley_chang@...ltek.com>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add the compatible
name 'snps,dwc3-rtk-soc'
On 02/05/2023 10:56, Stanley Chang[昌育德] wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>>>> On 02/05/2023 07:04, Stanley Chang wrote:
>>>>> Add a new compatible name 'snps,dwc3-rtk-soc' of DT for realtek dwc3
>>>>> core to adjust the global register start address
>>>>>
>>>>> The RTK DHC SoCs were designed, the global register address offset
>>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> What are: "RTK" and "DHC"? These are manufactured by Synopsys as you
>>>> suggest in the patch?
>>>
>>> RTK is Realtek.
>>> DHC is the department name in Realtek and the abbreviation of the Digital
>> Home Center.
>>> The USB controller of RTK DHC SoCs used the DWC3 IP of Synopsys.
>>
>> Then entire compatible is not correct. Vendor is Realtek not Synopsys.
>> DHC is not even device name. Use real device names.
>
> So, can we use the compatible name as 'realtek,dwc3' ?
dwc3 is not a real device name for Realtek.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists