[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <670b3581-db50-4ba4-ad49-73c1e7006ad1@kili.mountain>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 14:31:20 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Cc: lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Subject: fs/ksmbd/smb_common.c:350 smb1_allocate_rsp_buf() warn: Please
consider using kzalloc instead of kmalloc
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: d06f5a3f7140921ada47d49574ae6fa4de5e2a89
commit: dc8289f912387c3bcfbc5d2db29c8947fa207c11 ksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in init_smb2_rsp_hdr
config: openrisc-randconfig-m041-20230423 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230428/202304281001.oskkuJo0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202304281001.oskkuJo0-lkp@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
fs/ksmbd/smb_common.c:350 smb1_allocate_rsp_buf() warn: Please consider using kzalloc instead of kmalloc
vim +350 fs/ksmbd/smb_common.c
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 348 static int smb1_allocate_rsp_buf(struct ksmbd_work *work)
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 349 {
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 @350 work->response_buf = kmalloc(MAX_CIFS_SMALL_BUFFER_SIZE,
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 351 GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
Someone else wrote this Smatch check to encourage people to use kzalloc()
instead of __GFP_ZERO. I try stay out of style debates. :P
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 352 work->response_sz = MAX_CIFS_SMALL_BUFFER_SIZE;
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 353
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 354 if (!work->response_buf) {
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 355 pr_err("Failed to allocate %u bytes buffer\n",
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 356 MAX_CIFS_SMALL_BUFFER_SIZE);
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 357 return -ENOMEM;
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 358 }
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 359
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 360 return 0;
dc8289f912387c Namjae Jeon 2023-04-01 361 }
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists