linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: tests - modular KUnit tests should not depend on KUNIT=y

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 02 May 2023 13:34:40 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: tests - modular KUnit tests should not
 depend on KUNIT=y

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:

> Hi Javier,
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 1:19 PM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>> I've only been Cc'ed in patch #2.
>
> Not really, you're in the To-header on the full series?
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1683022164.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
>

Strange... I only got patch #2, neither patch #1 nor the cover letter.

For patch #1 as well:

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>

Sorry for missing that bug and thanks a lot for fixing it!

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat