[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFEeCANq-F7JODRD@chrisdown.name>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 15:28:24 +0100
From: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] printk: console: Support console-specific
loglevels
John Ogness writes:
>I agree that we should go with your 1st proposal. But I would like to
>see some comments added into printk_get_next_message() that only @flags
>and @level may be considered valid.
Thanks, will do for v6.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists