linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing to file-backed mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f3231c0-34b2-1e78-0bf0-f32d5b67811d@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 17:09:06 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
        Nelson Escobar <neescoba@...co.com>,
        Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Topel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Mika Penttila <mpenttil@...hat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing to
 file-backed mappings

On 02.05.23 15:56, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 5/2/23 9:50 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:47:43PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> Eventually we want to implement a mechanism where we can dynamically pin in response to RPCIT.
>>>
>>> Okay, so IIRC we'll fail starting the domain early, that's good. And if we
>>> pin all guest memory (instead of small pieces dynamically), there is little
>>> existing use for file-backed RAM in such zPCI configurations (because memory
>>> cannot be reclaimed either way if it's all pinned), so likely there are no
>>> real existing users.
>>
>> Right, this is VFIO, the physical HW can't tolerate not having pinned
>> memory, so something somewhere is always pinning it.
> 
> I might have mis-explained above.
> 
> With iommufd nesting, we will pin everything upfront as a starting point.
> 
> The current usage of vfio type1 iommu for s390 does not pin the entirety of guest memory upfront, it happens as guest RPCITs occur / type1 mappings are made.

... so, after the domain started successfully on the libvirt/QEMU side ? :/

It would be great to confirm that. There might be a BUG in patch #2 (see 
my reply to patch #2) that might not allow you to reproduce it right now.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb