[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <841522397.0ifERbkFSE@z3ntu.xyz>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 17:35:04 +0200
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Input: pwm-vibra - add support for enable GPIO
On Dienstag, 2. Mai 2023 02:47:29 CEST Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:34:28PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Some pwm vibrators have a dedicated enable GPIO that needs to be set
> > high so that the vibrator works. Add support for that optionally.
>
> So this is not simply a power supply in your case controlled by a GPIO?
> We truly can have both GPIO and a separate regulator?
Yes it appears to be the EN pin on the ISA1000A, see
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/380475
On apq8026-lg-lenok there is a similar setup for the vibration motor although
there I don't know whether it's actually a fixed-regulator or not, but since
the two devices were built in a similar time (without checking further) I
could assume they both contain the same IC.
Regards
Luca
>
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists