linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: drop VMA lock before waiting for migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGhVLvSj8v5CyRskm1XiWL9_xEoKt2AtfbJDHmpdtUGCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 09:41:23 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        josef@...icpanda.com, jack@...e.cz, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
        laurent.dufour@...ibm.com, michel@...pinasse.org,
        liam.howlett@...cle.com, jglisse@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        minchan@...gle.com, dave@...olabs.net, punit.agrawal@...edance.com,
        lstoakes@...il.com, hdanton@...a.com, apopple@...dia.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: drop VMA lock before waiting for migration

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 7:28 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:50:24AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > migration_entry_wait does not need VMA lock, therefore it can be dropped
> > before waiting. Introduce VM_FAULT_VMA_UNLOCKED to indicate that VMA
> > lock was dropped while in handle_mm_fault().
> > Note that once VMA lock is dropped, the VMA reference can't be used as
> > there are no guarantees it was not freed.
>
> How about we introduce:
>
> void vmf_end_read(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
>         if (!vmf->vma)
>                 return;
>         vma_end_read(vmf->vma);
>         vmf->vma = NULL;
> }
>
> Now we don't need a new flag, and calling vmf_end_read() is idempotent.
>
> Oh, argh, we create the vmf too late.  We really need to hoist the
> creation of vm_fault to the callers of handle_mm_fault().

Yeah, unfortunately vmf does not propagate all the way up to
do_user_addr_fault which needs to know that we dropped the lock.

>