linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert arm64: drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZFFK/qPTCIpGE2Tu@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 18:40:14 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Justin Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jmforbes@...uxtx.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert arm64: drop ranges in definition of
 ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 07:15:20PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:07:41PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 04:24:38PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > 
> > Regarding EXPERT, we could drop it and do like the other architectures
> > but we'll have randconfig occasionally hitting weird values that won't
> > build (like -1). Not sure EXPERT helps here.
> 
> AFAIU, randconfig does not randomize int values, it's probably random
> people that do ;-)

https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303232149.Chh6KhiI-lkp@intel.com

with the randconfig here:

https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230323/202303232149.Chh6KhiI-lkp@intel.com/config

That said, it would fail on other architectures as well, maybe they are
just not wired up in the build machines.

-- 
Catalin