[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFF35BpA7xf0OBF/@google.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 13:51:48 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Maximilian Weigand <mweigand2017@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair@...stair23.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: input: cypress,tt21000 - fix
interrupt type in dts example
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 04:23:54PM +0200, Maximilian Weigand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02.05.23 02:24, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 01:30:07PM +0200, Maximilian Weigand wrote:
> >> Triggering the interrupt of the IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW type can lead to
> >> probing issues with the device for the current driver (encountered on
> >> the Pine64 PineNote). Basically the interrupt would be triggered before
> >> certain commands were sent to the device, leading to a race between the
> >> device responding fast enough and the irq handler fetching a data frame
> >> from it. Actually all devices currently using the driver already use a
> >> falling edge trigger.
> >
> > I'd prefer we adjusted the driver to handle level interrupts properly.
>
> Ok, I will have a look at that. Just to be clear: The driver should work
> only with level interrupts, or should it optimally support both level
> and falling edge triggers?
Optimally a driver would work well with both.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists