[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW76--qgbEWn8YZY7Hj1GjB9__kfSjWnHz=WNBSV8GyCXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 15:25:13 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Allow inline functions not inlined to be traced
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 1:41 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> Over 10 years ago there were many bugs that caused function tracing to
> crash because some inlined function was not inlined and should not have
> been traced. This made it hard to debug because when the developer tried
> to reproduce it, if their compiler still inlined the function, the bug
> would not trigger. The solution back then was simply to add "notrace" to
> "inline" which would make sure all functions that are marked inline are
> never traced even when the compiler decides to not inline them.
>
> A lot has changed over the last 10 years.
>
> 1) ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() is now used by all ftrace hooks which
> will prevent the recursive crashes from happening that was caused by
> inlined functions being traced.
>
> 2) noinstr is now used to mark pretty much all functions that would also
> cause problems if they are traced.
>
> Today, it is no longer a problem if an inlined function is not inlined and
> is traced. Removing notrace from inline has been requested several times
> over the years. I believe it is now safe to do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Thanks!
Song
> ---
> include/linux/compiler_types.h | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> index 547ea1ff806e..c8f23ba1c339 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -182,9 +182,8 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
> * externally visible function. This makes extern inline behave as per gnu89
> * semantics rather than c99. This prevents multiple symbol definition errors
> * of extern inline functions at link time.
> - * A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing.
> */
> -#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused notrace
> +#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused
>
> /*
> * gcc provides both __inline__ and __inline as alternate spellings of
> @@ -230,7 +229,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
> * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368
> * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings.
> */
> -# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address notrace __maybe_unused
> +# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address __maybe_unused
> # define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kasan_or_inline
> #else
> # define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline
> @@ -247,7 +246,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
> * disable all instrumentation. See Kconfig.kcsan where this is mandatory.
> */
> # define __no_kcsan __no_sanitize_thread __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation
> -# define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kcsan notrace __maybe_unused
> +# define __no_sanitize_or_inline __no_kcsan __maybe_unused
> #else
> # define __no_kcsan
> #endif
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists