[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c54a6f1-63e1-0870-4fb1-f9128291d15a@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 16:24:07 -0700
From: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/msm/dpu: Add has_data_compress to dpu_caps
On 5/3/2023 4:03 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> Hi Jessica,
>
> On 2023-05-03 12:03:40, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/2023 12:07 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> On 2023-05-02 18:19:14, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>>> Add data_compress feature to DPU HW catalog.
>>>>
>>>> In DPU 7.x and later, there is a DATA_COMPRESS register that must be set
>>>> within the DPU INTF block for DSC to work.
>>>>
>>>> As core_rev (and related macros) was removed from the dpu_kms struct, the
>>>> most straightforward way to indicate the presence of this register would be
>>>> to have a flag in dpu_caps.
>>>
>>> This is a very generic name to have in the global dpu_caps for a very
>>> specific register on the INTF block since DPU >= 7.0.0, and I doubt any
>>> new catalog contributor will know how to fill this field. After all,
>>> DPU < 7.0.0 also has DCE but it is controlled via the PINGPONG block.
>>>
>>> Instead, how about having it as a DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS (or similar)
>>> feature flag on the INTF block? We do the same for other (register
>>> related) features on the INTF block, and you did the same to disable DSC
>>> callbacks on PP in [1].
>
> (Note: I said "you" but meant Kuogee)
>
>> Hi Marijn,
>>
>> Sounds good.
>>
>>>
>>> In fact it seems that the DSC/DCE (enablement) registers have been moved
>>> from PINGPONG to INTF in DPU 7.0.0. Can you clarify in the patch
>>> message for v2 that this is the case, and do the same in the linked
>>> PINGPONG patch? Perhaps these patches should be part of the same series
>>> as they do not seem DSI-specific.
>>
>> Will make a note of the PP to INTF change in the commit message.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> I would prefer to keep this patch in this series is because it is needed
>> for DSI over command mode to work and the subsequent patch is
>> specifically for command mode.
>
> That is fine, but do mention this in the commit message if it is
> relevant here. Otherwise only mention it as part of patch 4/4.
Acked.
Thanks,
Jessica Zhang
>
> - Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists