[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFITjVD_7nPYUgjf@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 09:55:57 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: fix invalid-bdaddr quirk for
non-persistent setup
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 04:44:48PM -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:35 AM Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Devices that lack persistent storage for the device address can indicate
> > this by setting the HCI_QUIRK_INVALID_BDADDR which causes the controller
> > to be marked as unconfigured until user space has set a valid address.
> >
> > Once configured, the device address must be set on every setup for
> > controllers with HCI_QUIRK_NON_PERSISTENT_SETUP to avoid marking the
> > controller as unconfigured and requiring the address to be set again.
> >
> > Fixes: 740011cfe948 ("Bluetooth: Add new quirk for non-persistent setup settings")
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c
> > index a8785126df75..f45598b5a532 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c
> > @@ -4573,23 +4573,17 @@ static int hci_dev_setup_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> > invalid_bdaddr = test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_INVALID_BDADDR, &hdev->quirks);
> >
> > if (!ret) {
> > - if (test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_BDADDR_PROPERTY, &hdev->quirks)) {
> > - if (!bacmp(&hdev->public_addr, BDADDR_ANY))
> > - hci_dev_get_bd_addr_from_property(hdev);
> > -
> > - if (bacmp(&hdev->public_addr, BDADDR_ANY) &&
> > - hdev->set_bdaddr) {
> > - ret = hdev->set_bdaddr(hdev,
> > - &hdev->public_addr);
> > -
> > - /* If setting of the BD_ADDR from the device
> > - * property succeeds, then treat the address
> > - * as valid even if the invalid BD_ADDR
> > - * quirk indicates otherwise.
> > - */
> > - if (!ret)
> > - invalid_bdaddr = false;
> > - }
> > + if (test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_BDADDR_PROPERTY, &hdev->quirks) &&
> > + !bacmp(&hdev->public_addr, BDADDR_ANY))
> > + hci_dev_get_bd_addr_from_property(hdev);
> > +
> > + if ((invalid_bdaddr ||
> > + test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_USE_BDADDR_PROPERTY, &hdev->quirks)) &&
> > + bacmp(&hdev->public_addr, BDADDR_ANY) &&
> > + hdev->set_bdaddr) {
> > + ret = hdev->set_bdaddr(hdev, &hdev->public_addr);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + invalid_bdaddr = false;
>
> I'd keep the original comments since it appears you haven't changed
> its logic with respect to invalid_bdaddr.
The comment no longer applies as set_bdaddr can now be called also when
there is no "device property" holding the address (e.g. when one has
been set using btmgmt and HCI_QUIRK_NON_PERSISTENT_SETUP is set).
And obviously we shouldn't mark the controller as unconfigured after
we've successfully set an address.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists