[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230503081049.73847-3-daniel.baluta@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 11:10:49 +0300
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....nxp.com>
To: broonie@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com,
yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com, daniel.baluta@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: sof: Improve sof_ipc4_bytes_ext_put function
From: Paul Olaru <paul.olaru@....com>
The function is improved in the way that if the firmware returns a
validation error on the newly sent bytes, then the kernel will
automatically restore to the old bytes value for a given kcontrol.
This way, if the firmware rejects a data blob then the kernel will also
reject it, instead of saving it for the next suspend/resume cycle. The
old behaviour is that the kernel would save it anyway and on next
firmware boot it would apply the previously-rejected configuration,
leading to errors during playback.
Additionally, the function also saves previously validated
configurations, so that if the firmware does end up rejecting a new
bytes value the kernel can send an old, previously-valid configuration.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Olaru <paul.olaru@....com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
---
sound/soc/sof/ipc4-control.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-control.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-control.c
index 6f0698be9451..c6d404d44097 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-control.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-control.c
@@ -54,6 +54,26 @@ static int sof_ipc4_set_get_kcontrol_data(struct snd_sof_control *scontrol,
msg->primary |= SOF_IPC4_MOD_INSTANCE(swidget->instance_id);
ret = iops->set_get_data(sdev, msg, msg->data_size, set);
+ if (!set)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ /* It is a set-data operation, and we have a valid backup that we can restore */
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ if (!scontrol->old_ipc_control_data)
+ goto unlock;
+ /*
+ * Current ipc_control_data is not valid, we use the last known good
+ * configuration
+ */
+ memcpy(scontrol->ipc_control_data, scontrol->old_ipc_control_data,
+ scontrol->max_size);
+ kfree(scontrol->old_ipc_control_data);
+ scontrol->old_ipc_control_data = NULL;
+ /* Send the last known good configuration to firmware */
+ ret = iops->set_get_data(sdev, msg, msg->data_size, set);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto unlock;
+ }
unlock:
if (lock)
@@ -327,13 +347,24 @@ static int sof_ipc4_bytes_ext_put(struct snd_sof_control *scontrol,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!scontrol->old_ipc_control_data) {
+ /* Create a backup of the current, valid bytes control */
+ scontrol->old_ipc_control_data = kmemdup(scontrol->ipc_control_data,
+ scontrol->max_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!scontrol->old_ipc_control_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
/* Copy the whole binary data which includes the ABI header and the payload */
- if (copy_from_user(data, tlvd->tlv, header.length))
+ if (copy_from_user(data, tlvd->tlv, header.length)) {
+ memcpy(scontrol->ipc_control_data, scontrol->old_ipc_control_data,
+ scontrol->max_size);
+ kfree(scontrol->old_ipc_control_data);
+ scontrol->old_ipc_control_data = NULL;
return -EFAULT;
+ }
- sof_ipc4_set_get_bytes_data(sdev, scontrol, true, true);
-
- return 0;
+ return sof_ipc4_set_get_bytes_data(sdev, scontrol, true, true);
}
static int _sof_ipc4_bytes_ext_get(struct snd_sof_control *scontrol,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists