[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <888841c4-7bd4-8174-7786-033715c995c6@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 11:11:32 +0200
From: Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [RFC PATCH 3/4] drm/ttm: Handle -EAGAIN in
ttm_resource_alloc as -ENOSPC.
Hi, Maarten
On 5/3/23 10:34, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This allows the drm cgroup controller to return no space is available..
>
> XXX: This is a hopeless simplification that changes behavior, and
> returns -ENOSPC even if we could evict ourselves from the current
> cgroup.
>
> Ideally, the eviction code becomes cgroup aware, and will force eviction
> from the current cgroup or its parents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Thinking of the shrinker analogy, do non-cgroup aware shrinkers just
shrink blindly or do they reject shrinking like this patch when a cgroup
limit is reached?
/Thomas
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index bd5dae4d1624..e057d5d8f09a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, mem);
> if (likely(!ret))
> break;
> + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> + return -ENOSPC;
> if (unlikely(ret != -ENOSPC))
> return ret;
> ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, man, place, ctx,
> @@ -783,7 +785,7 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>
> type_found = true;
> ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, mem);
> - if (ret == -ENOSPC)
> + if (ret == -ENOSPC || ret == -EAGAIN)
> continue;
> if (unlikely(ret))
> goto error;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists