Message-Id: <20230502191821.71c86a2c25f19fe342aa72db@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2023 19:18:21 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
        Nelson Escobar <neescoba@...co.com>,
        Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Topel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Mika Penttila <mpenttil@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing
 to file-backed mappings

On Tue,  2 May 2023 23:51:35 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com> wrote:

> Writing to file-backed dirty-tracked mappings via GUP is inherently broken
> as we cannot rule out folios being cleaned and then a GUP user writing to
> them again and possibly marking them dirty unexpectedly.
> 
> This is especially egregious for long-term mappings (as indicated by the
> use of the FOLL_LONGTERM flag), so we disallow this case in GUP-fast as
> we have already done in the slow path.
> 
> We have access to less information in the fast path as we cannot examine
> the VMA containing the mapping, however we can determine whether the folio
> is anonymous or belonging to a whitelisted filesystem - specifically
> hugetlb and shmem mappings.
> 
> We take special care to ensure that both the folio and mapping are safe to
> access when performing these checks and document folio_fast_pin_allowed()
> accordingly.
> 
> It's important to note that there are no APIs allowing users to specify
> FOLL_FAST_ONLY for a PUP-fast let alone with FOLL_LONGTERM, so we can
> always rely on the fact that if we fail to pin on the fast path, the code
> will fall back to the slow path which can perform the more thorough check.

arm allnoconfig said

mm/gup.c:115:13: warning: 'folio_fast_pin_allowed' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
  115 | static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

so I moved the definition inside CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.



 mm/gup.c |  154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/gup.c~mm-gup-disallow-foll_longterm-gup-fast-writing-to-file-backed-mappings-fix
+++ a/mm/gup.c
@@ -96,83 +96,6 @@ retry:
 	return folio;
 }
 
-/*
- * Used in the GUP-fast path to determine whether a pin is permitted for a
- * specific folio.
- *
- * This call assumes the caller has pinned the folio, that the lowest page table
- * level still points to this folio, and that interrupts have been disabled.
- *
- * Writing to pinned file-backed dirty tracked folios is inherently problematic
- * (see comment describing the writable_file_mapping_allowed() function). We
- * therefore try to avoid the most egregious case of a long-term mapping doing
- * so.
- *
- * This function cannot be as thorough as that one as the VMA is not available
- * in the fast path, so instead we whitelist known good cases and if in doubt,
- * fall back to the slow path.
- */
-static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
-{
-	struct address_space *mapping;
-	unsigned long mapping_flags;
-
-	/*
-	 * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term
-	 * pin is the most egregious case so this is the one we disallow.
-	 */
-	if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) !=
-	    (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE))
-		return true;
-
-	/* The folio is pinned, so we can safely access folio fields. */
-
-	/* Neither of these should be possible, but check to be sure. */
-	if (unlikely(folio_test_slab(folio) || folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
-		return false;
-
-	/* hugetlb mappings do not require dirty-tracking. */
-	if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
-		return true;
-
-	/*
-	 * GUP-fast disables IRQs. When IRQS are disabled, RCU grace periods
-	 * cannot proceed, which means no actions performed under RCU can
-	 * proceed either.
-	 *
-	 * inodes and thus their mappings are freed under RCU, which means the
-	 * mapping cannot be freed beneath us and thus we can safely dereference
-	 * it.
-	 */
-	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
-
-	/*
-	 * However, there may be operations which _alter_ the mapping, so ensure
-	 * we read it once and only once.
-	 */
-	mapping = READ_ONCE(folio->mapping);
-
-	/*
-	 * The mapping may have been truncated, in any case we cannot determine
-	 * if this mapping is safe - fall back to slow path to determine how to
-	 * proceed.
-	 */
-	if (!mapping)
-		return false;
-
-	/* Anonymous folios are fine, other non-file backed cases are not. */
-	mapping_flags = (unsigned long)mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS;
-	if (mapping_flags)
-		return mapping_flags == PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
-
-	/*
-	 * At this point, we know the mapping is non-null and points to an
-	 * address_space object. The only remaining whitelisted file system is
-	 * shmem.
-	 */
-	return shmem_mapping(mapping);
-}
-
 /**
  * try_grab_folio() - Attempt to get or pin a folio.
  * @page:  pointer to page to be grabbed
@@ -2474,6 +2397,83 @@ static void __maybe_unused undo_dev_page
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
 /*
+ * Used in the GUP-fast path to determine whether a pin is permitted for a
+ * specific folio.
+ *
+ * This call assumes the caller has pinned the folio, that the lowest page table
+ * level still points to this folio, and that interrupts have been disabled.
+ *
+ * Writing to pinned file-backed dirty tracked folios is inherently problematic
+ * (see comment describing the writable_file_mapping_allowed() function). We
+ * therefore try to avoid the most egregious case of a long-term mapping doing
+ * so.
+ *
+ * This function cannot be as thorough as that one as the VMA is not available
+ * in the fast path, so instead we whitelist known good cases and if in doubt,
+ * fall back to the slow path.
+ */
+static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct address_space *mapping;
+	unsigned long mapping_flags;
+
+	/*
+	 * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term
+	 * pin is the most egregious case so this is the one we disallow.
+	 */
+	if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) !=
+	    (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE))
+		return true;
+
+	/* The folio is pinned, so we can safely access folio fields. */
+
+	/* Neither of these should be possible, but check to be sure. */
+	if (unlikely(folio_test_slab(folio) || folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
+		return false;
+
+	/* hugetlb mappings do not require dirty-tracking. */
+	if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * GUP-fast disables IRQs. When IRQS are disabled, RCU grace periods
+	 * cannot proceed, which means no actions performed under RCU can
+	 * proceed either.
+	 *
+	 * inodes and thus their mappings are freed under RCU, which means the
+	 * mapping cannot be freed beneath us and thus we can safely dereference
+	 * it.
+	 */
+	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+
+	/*
+	 * However, there may be operations which _alter_ the mapping, so ensure
+	 * we read it once and only once.
+	 */
+	mapping = READ_ONCE(folio->mapping);
+
+	/*
+	 * The mapping may have been truncated, in any case we cannot determine
+	 * if this mapping is safe - fall back to slow path to determine how to
+	 * proceed.
+	 */
+	if (!mapping)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Anonymous folios are fine, other non-file backed cases are not. */
+	mapping_flags = (unsigned long)mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS;
+	if (mapping_flags)
+		return mapping_flags == PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
+
+	/*
+	 * At this point, we know the mapping is non-null and points to an
+	 * address_space object. The only remaining whitelisted file system is
+	 * shmem.
+	 */
+	return shmem_mapping(mapping);
+}
+
+/*
  * Fast-gup relies on pte change detection to avoid concurrent pgtable
  * operations.
  *
_

Powered by blists - more mailing lists