lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68d017d9-d815-01d4-23c1-49c0aaf5f20b@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 11:11:33 -0500
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <mlimonci@....com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 217394 - IRQ override skipping breaks the Aya
 Neo Air Plus 6800U keyboard buttons

+linux-input

On 5/3/2023 7:58 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker.
>
> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
> kernel developers don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by mail.
>
> Chuanhong Guo, apparently it's cause by a change of yours.
>
> Note, you have to use bugzilla to reach the reporter, as I sadly[1] can
> not CCed them in mails like this.
>
> Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217394 :
>
>>   Matthew 2023-05-03 02:28:33 UTC
>>
>> Reverting the changes found in this patch fixes the issue:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220712020058.90374-1-gch981213@gmail.com/
>> With that patch the AT Translated Set 2 Keyboard doesn't show up with the evtest and is not usable.
>>
>> Hardware:
>>
>> Aya Neo Air Plus
>> AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
> See the ticket for more details.
>
> BTW: there apparently is another IRQ override needed for a different
> machine. See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216804#c8 for
> details (ignore the comments before that, the quirk entry for that
> machine was merged; comment 8 and all related to it really should have a
> separate bug; that's also why this partly fall through the cracks here
> :-/ ). The user is currently trying to create a patch.
>
Something I'm wondering about is if it's possible for i8042 to detect 
the polarity is incorrect when it probes and
to try to correct it.

If we could do that we can probably drop 9946e39fe8d0 ("ACPI: resource: 
skip IRQ override on AMD Zen platforms")
to fix this issue along with all the other quirks that have collected 
over time on i8042 polarity issues.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ