linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add support for multipd model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdb8e5a9-d8a0-1881-894f-1202ceefcc21@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 18:27:33 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com, quic_gurus@...cinc.com,
        quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, quic_eberman@...cinc.com,
        quic_poovendh@...cinc.com, robimarko@...il.com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        quic_anusha@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_kathirav@...cinc.com,
        agross@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add support for
 multipd model

On 03/05/2023 12:59, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/7/2023 6:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:11:27 +0530, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>> Add new binding document for multipd model remoteproc.
>>> IPQ5018, IPQ9574 follows multipd model.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.yaml | 282 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 282 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.yaml
>>>
>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.example.dts:22:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5018.h: No such file or directory
>>     22 |         #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5018.h>
>>        |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:419: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,multipd-pil.example.dtb] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make: *** [Makefile:1512: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>
>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/1678164097-13247-2-git-send-email-quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com
>>
>> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>> should be noted in *this* patch.
>>
>> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
>> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
>> date:
>>
>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>
>> Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
>> that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
>> your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
>>
> 
> I mentioned dependency link 
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220621161126.15883-1-quic_srichara@quicinc.com/) 
> in cover page patch because it's required for entire series. I will add 
> dependency link's and raise new patchset.

Is the dependency merged for v6.4-rc1? Looks not, so this means the
patch cannot be merged for next three months.

Why do you need any dependency here in this binding?

Best regards,
Krzysztof