[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFHgAhisxjKQxhLx@debian.me>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 11:16:02 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Danila Chernetsov <listdansp@...l.ru>,
Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
Cc: linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
Subject: ntfs orphan? (was Re: [PATCH] ntfs: do not dereference a null ctx on
error)
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 07:44:33PM +0000, Danila Chernetsov wrote:
> In ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(), if an error condition occurs
> prior to 'ctx' being set to a non-NULL value, avoid dereferencing the NULL
> 'ctx' pointer in error handling.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Duplicate of 10-years-old outstanding patch at [1].
I'm not speaking of the patch itself but rather on unfortunate state
of ntfs subsystem. It seems like the maintainer is MIA (has not
responding to patch submissions for a long time). Some trivial
patches, however, are merged through mm tree.
Konstantin (from newer ntfs3 subsystem), Andrew, would you like to take a
look on this orphaned subsystem (and help reviewing)? I'd like to send
MAINTAINERS update if it turns out to be the case.
Thanks.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1358389709-20561-1-git-send-email-nickolai@csail.mit.edu/
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists