lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 20:51:02 +0200
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@...ca-geosystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX8MM-EVKB

On 23-05-03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/05/2023 17:20, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > From: Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@...ca-geosystems.com>
> > 
> > Add DT compatible for the imx8mm EVKB [1].
> > 
> > [1] https://www.nxp.com/design/development-boards/ \
> > 	i-mx-evaluation-and-development-boards/ \
> > 	evaluation-kit-for-the-i-mx-8m-mini-applications-processor:8MMINILPD4-EVK
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schneider <johannes.schneider@...ca-geosystems.com>
> > [m.felsch@...gutronix.de: Adapt the commit message]
> > [m.felsch@...gutronix.de: Adapt the yaml comment]
> 
> I don't see any differences. The comment is exactly the same as before.

I fogot to say that I used V8 as base which caused problems on Shawns
side and there was a difference.

> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
> version they apply.
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

As said above..

Regards,
  Marco

> 
> 
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ