linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 42/53] nbd: fix incomplete validation of ioctl arg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230504194413.3806354-42-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu,  4 May 2023 15:44:02 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>,
        Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...er.debian.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 42/53] nbd: fix incomplete validation of ioctl arg

From: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 55793ea54d77719a071b1ccc05a05056e3b5e009 ]

We tested and found an alarm caused by nbd_ioctl arg without verification.
The UBSAN warning calltrace like below:

UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/buffer.c:1709:35
signed integer overflow:
-9223372036854775808 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
CPU: 3 PID: 2523 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #1
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f0 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78
 show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x170/0x1dc lib/dump_stack.c:118
 ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0xb4 lib/ubsan.c:161
 handle_overflow+0x188/0x1dc lib/ubsan.c:192
 __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow+0x34/0x44 lib/ubsan.c:206
 __block_write_full_page+0x94c/0xa20 fs/buffer.c:1709
 block_write_full_page+0x1f0/0x280 fs/buffer.c:2934
 blkdev_writepage+0x34/0x40 fs/block_dev.c:607
 __writepage+0x68/0xe8 mm/page-writeback.c:2305
 write_cache_pages+0x44c/0xc70 mm/page-writeback.c:2240
 generic_writepages+0xdc/0x148 mm/page-writeback.c:2329
 blkdev_writepages+0x2c/0x38 fs/block_dev.c:2114
 do_writepages+0xd4/0x250 mm/page-writeback.c:2344

The reason for triggering this warning is __block_write_full_page()
-> i_size_read(inode) - 1 overflow.
inode->i_size is assigned in __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_set_size() -> bytesize.
We think it is necessary to limit the size of arg to prevent errors.

Moreover, __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_add_socket(), arg will be cast to int.
Assuming the value of arg is 0x80000000000000001) (on a 64-bit machine),
it will become 1 after the coercion, which will return unexpected results.

Fix it by adding checks to prevent passing in too large numbers.

Signed-off-by: Zhong Jinghua <zhongjinghua@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230206145805.2645671-1-zhongjinghua@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/block/nbd.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
index 592cfa8b765a5..e1c954094b6c0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -325,6 +325,9 @@ static int nbd_set_size(struct nbd_device *nbd, loff_t bytesize,
 	if (blk_validate_block_size(blksize))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (bytesize < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	nbd->config->bytesize = bytesize;
 	nbd->config->blksize_bits = __ffs(blksize);
 
@@ -1111,6 +1114,9 @@ static int nbd_add_socket(struct nbd_device *nbd, unsigned long arg,
 	struct nbd_sock *nsock;
 	int err;
 
+	/* Arg will be cast to int, check it to avoid overflow */
+	if (arg > INT_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	sock = nbd_get_socket(nbd, arg, &err);
 	if (!sock)
 		return err;
-- 
2.39.2