linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ufs: core: Add error handling for MCQ mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b35c2e61-6fb1-37d5-886e-0fb67ee0d0a2@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2023 21:18:02 -0700
From:   "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_cang@...cinc.com>, <mani@...nel.org>,
        <Powen.Kao@...iatek.com>, <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        <avri.altman@....com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ufs: core: Add error handling for MCQ mode

On 4/25/2023 5:21 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/17/23 14:05, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
>> +        /* MCQ mode */
>> +        if (is_mcq_enabled(hba))
>> +            return ufshcd_clear_cmds(hba, 1UL << lrbp->task_tag);
> 
> The above code will trigger an overflow if lrbp->task_tag >= 8 * 
> sizeof(unsigned long). That's not acceptable.
This ufshcd_clear_cmds() uses a bit map. There are multiple places in 
the UFS code have this limitation if the queue depth grows to be greater 
than 64. I am thinking:
1. Current ufs controllers in the market probably support queue depth 64 
or less, so it may not be a problem today if host controller cap is set 
to 64 queue depth, but can be a problem in multiple places in the code 
later.
2. In mcq mode, we can pass a tag number into this api 
ufshcd_clear_cmds(); while in SDB mode, pass the tag's bit mask as before.
3. Use sbitmask() to support large queue depth? Thanks for any suggestions.

> 
>>   static irqreturn_t ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>   {
>> +    struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
>> +    u32 hwq_num, utag;
>> +    int tag;
>> +
>>       /* Resetting interrupt aggregation counters first and reading the
>>        * DOOR_BELL afterward allows us to handle all the completed 
>> requests.
>>        * In order to prevent other interrupts starvation the DB is 
>> read once
>> @@ -5580,7 +5590,22 @@ static irqreturn_t 
>> ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>        * Ignore the ufshcd_poll() return value and return IRQ_HANDLED 
>> since we
>>        * do not want polling to trigger spurious interrupt complaints.
>>        */
>> -    ufshcd_poll(hba->host, UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT);
>> +    if (!is_mcq_enabled(hba)) {
>> +        ufshcd_poll(hba->host, UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT);
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* MCQ mode */
>> +    for (tag = 0; tag < hba->nutrs; tag++) {
>> +        lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
>> +        if (lrbp->cmd) {
>> +            utag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scsi_cmd_to_rq(lrbp->cmd));
>> +            hwq_num = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(utag);
>> +            ufshcd_poll(hba->host, hwq_num);
>> +        }
>> +    }
> 
> Is my understanding correct that ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() is only 
> called from single doorbell code paths and hence that the above change 
> is not necessary?
ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() can be invoked from MCQ mode such as the 
ufshcd_err_handler() as below:
ufshcd_err_handler()-->ufshcd_complete_requests()-->ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()

> 
> 
>> +    if (is_mcq_enabled(hba)) {
>> +        struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp;
>> +        int tag;
>> +
>> +        for (tag = 0; tag < hba->nutrs; tag++) {
>> +            lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
>> +            if (lrbp->cmd) {
>> +                ret = ufshcd_try_to_abort_task(hba, tag);
>> +                dev_err(hba->dev, "Aborting tag %d / CDB %#02x %s\n", 
>> tag,
>> +                    hba->lrb[tag].cmd ? hba->lrb[tag].cmd->cmnd[0] : -1,
>> +                    ret ? "failed" : "succeeded");
>> +            }
>> +            if (ret) {
>> +                needs_reset = true;
>> +                goto out;
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +    } else {
>> +        /* Clear pending transfer requests */
>> +        for_each_set_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs, hba->nutrs) {
>> +            ret = ufshcd_try_to_abort_task(hba, tag);
>> +            dev_err(hba->dev, "Aborting tag %d / CDB %#02x %s\n", tag,
>> +                hba->lrb[tag].cmd ? hba->lrb[tag].cmd->cmnd[0] : -1,
>> +                ret ? "failed" : "succeeded");
>> +            if (ret) {
>> +                needs_reset = true;
>> +                goto out;
>> +            }
>>           }
>>       }
> 
> Please introduce helper functions for the MCQ and SDB code paths such 
> that the nesting level of the above code is reduced.
Sure. I will change.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.