linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 07/13] list_bl.h: Fix parentheses around macro pointer parameter use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230504200527.1935944-8-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date:   Thu,  4 May 2023 16:05:21 -0400
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/13] list_bl.h: Fix parentheses around macro pointer parameter use

Add missing parentheses around use of macro argument "tpos" in those
patterns to ensure operator precedence behaves as expected:

- typeof(*tpos)
- pos->next
- "x = y" is changed for "x = (y)", because "y" can be an expression
  containing a comma if it is the result of the expansion of a macro such
  as #define eval(...) __VA_ARGS__, which would cause unexpected operator
  precedence. This use-case is far-fetched, but we have to choose one
  way or the other (with or without parentheses) for consistency.
- x && y is changed for (x) && (y).

The typeof(*tpos) lack of parentheses around "tpos" is not an issue per se
in the specific macros modified here because "tpos" is used as an lvalue,
which should prevent use of any operator causing issue. Still add the
extra parentheses for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
---
 include/linux/list_bl.h | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
index ae1b541446c9..450cca15496b 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
@@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ static inline bool hlist_bl_is_locked(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
  */
 #define hlist_bl_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member)		\
 	for (pos = hlist_bl_first(head);				\
-	     pos &&							\
-		({ tpos = hlist_bl_entry(pos, typeof(*tpos), member); 1;}); \
-	     pos = pos->next)
+	     (pos) &&							\
+		({ tpos = hlist_bl_entry(pos, typeof(*(tpos)), member); 1;}); \
+	     pos = (pos)->next)
 
 /**
  * hlist_bl_for_each_entry_safe - iterate over list of given type safe against removal of list entry
@@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ static inline bool hlist_bl_is_locked(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
  */
 #define hlist_bl_for_each_entry_safe(tpos, pos, n, head, member)	 \
 	for (pos = hlist_bl_first(head);				 \
-	     pos && ({ n = pos->next; 1; }) && 				 \
-		({ tpos = hlist_bl_entry(pos, typeof(*tpos), member); 1;}); \
-	     pos = n)
+	     (pos) && ({ n = (pos)->next; 1; }) &&			 \
+		({ tpos = hlist_bl_entry(pos, typeof(*(tpos)), member); 1;}); \
+	     pos = (n))
 
 #endif
-- 
2.25.1