[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230504170111.70a7f639.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 17:01:11 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@...dia.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>,
"K V P, Satyanarayana" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@...el.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: demote hiding ecap messages to debug level
On Thu, 4 May 2023 15:16:54 +0200
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name> wrote:
> Seeing a burst of messages like this:
>
> vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x19@...d0
> vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@...00
> vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x26@...10
> vfio-pci 0000:98:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x27@...50
> vfio-pci 0000:98:00.1: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@...00
> vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x19@...d0
> vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@...00
> vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x26@...10
> vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.0: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x27@...50
> vfio-pci 0000:b1:00.1: vfio_ecap_init: hiding ecap 0x25@...00
>
> is of little to no value for an ordinary user.
>
> Hence, use pci_dbg() instead of pci_info().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index 948cdd464f4e..dd8dda14e701 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -1643,7 +1643,7 @@ static int vfio_ecap_init(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> }
>
> if (!len) {
> - pci_info(pdev, "%s: hiding ecap %#x@%#x\n",
> + pci_dbg(pdev, "%s: hiding ecap %#x@%#x\n",
> __func__, ecap, epos);
>
> /* If not the first in the chain, we can skip over it */
Looks fine to me, though I might adjust that next line to keep the
previous alignment. In general this has certainly caused more
confusion than insightful information, so demoting it to debug is a
good idea. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists