[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSmYapFcpnrC60o4r5LznT92TpjteNb=1MQejvMDWC+2vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 14:04:18 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: uclogic: Modular KUnit tests should not depend on KUNIT=y
On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 18:09, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
>
> While KUnit tests that cannot be built as a loadable module must depend
> on "KUNIT=y", this is not true for modular tests, where it adds an
> unnecessary limitation.
>
> Fix this by relaxing the dependency to "KUNIT".
>
> Fixes: 08809e482a1c44d9 ("HID: uclogic: KUnit best practices and naming conventions")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
This works here, and I definitely agree we should get rid of these
unnecessary constraints.
Let me know if this should go in via the kselftest/kunit tree, or if
it makes sense to take this via input?
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> index 4ce012f83253ec9f..b977450cac75265d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ config HID_MCP2221
>
> config HID_KUNIT_TEST
> tristate "KUnit tests for HID" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> - depends on KUNIT=y
> + depends on KUNIT
> depends on HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH
> depends on HID_UCLOGIC
> default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists