[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qksy7pmx4n2l2pbpos33x4nnhp5vwjqlnk72lycxk4benjtqfa@vewobmlevbj4>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 08:07:53 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v3 09/12] common/fio: Limit number of random jobs
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:16:34AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> For this series to merge let's keep is simple and not worry about erroring
> out on a particular job size but just keeping the nproc as it is ...
Works for me and as you pointed out, it avoids regressions with the default
values. Anyone who is tinkering with nvme_img_size should be aware of the
implications. I'll add a note about this to the documentation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists