[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9244de0-6fa8-e737-a38c-f0a6859ae592@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 14:59:35 +0800
From: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<john.allen@....com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/21] KVM:x86: Add #CP support in guest exception
classification
On 5/4/2023 1:36 PM, Binbin Wu wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/2023 11:41 AM, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>>
>> On 4/28/2023 2:09 PM, Binbin Wu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/21/2023 9:46 PM, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>>>> Add handling for Control Protection (#CP) exceptions(vector 21).
>>>> The new vector is introduced for Intel's Control-Flow Enforcement
>>>> Technology (CET) relevant violation cases.
>>>> See Intel's SDM for details.
>>>>
>> [...]
>>>> -static int exception_class(int vector)
>>>> +static int exception_class(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
>>>> {
>>>> switch (vector) {
>>>> case PF_VECTOR:
>>>> return EXCPT_PF;
>>>> + case CP_VECTOR:
>>>> + if (vcpu->arch.cr4_guest_rsvd_bits & X86_CR4_CET)
>>>> + return EXCPT_BENIGN;
>>>> + return EXCPT_CONTRIBUTORY;
>>> By definition, #CP is Contributory.
>>> Can you explain more about this change here which treats #CP as
>>> EXCPT_BENIGN when CET is not enabled in guest?
>>
>> I check the history of this patch, found maintainer modified the
>> patch due to some unit test issue in L1. You can check the
>>
>> details here:
>>
>> Re: [PATCH v15 04/14] KVM: x86: Add #CP support in guest exception
>> dispatch - Sean Christopherson (kernel.org)
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/all/YBsZwvwhshw+s7yQ@google.com/>
>>
> OK, is it better to add the reason in changelog?
>
> IIUC, a new contributory exception vector (if any) should be handled
> similarly (i.e., treated as contributory conditionally) in the future,
> right?
Agree although the issue happens in an uncommon case, I'll add some
description in changelog in following version, thanks!
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> In current KVM code, there is suppose no #CP triggered in guest if
>>> CET is not enalbed in guest, right?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>> case DE_VECTOR:
>>>> case TS_VECTOR:
>>>> case NP_VECTOR:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists