[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFNoVfb+1W4NAh74@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 10:09:57 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
mgorman@...e.de, dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
andreyknvl@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/40] lib: implement context capture support for tagged
allocations
On Wed 03-05-23 08:24:19, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:39 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 01-05-23 09:54:45, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +struct codetag_ctx *alloc_tag_create_ctx(struct alloc_tag *tag, size_t size)
> > > +{
> > > + struct alloc_call_ctx *ac_ctx;
> > > +
> > > + /* TODO: use a dedicated kmem_cache */
> > > + ac_ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(struct alloc_call_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > You cannot really use GFP_KERNEL here. This is post_alloc_hook path and
> > that has its own gfp context.
>
> I missed that. Would it be appropriate to use the gfp_flags parameter
> of post_alloc_hook() here?
No. the original allocation could have been GFP_USER based and you do
not want these allocations to pullute other zones potentially. You want
GFP_KERNEL compatible subset of that mask.
But even then I really detest an additional allocation from this context
for every single allocation request. There GFP_NOWAIT allocation for
steckdepot but that is at least cached and generally not allocating.
This will allocate for every single allocation. There must be a better
way.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists