linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 0/9] Unifying fabrics drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dca2b65a-2b76-50ed-7c58-e304efe1021c@grimberg.me>
Date:   Thu, 4 May 2023 13:25:27 +0300
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/9] Unifying fabrics drivers

> I've rebased on nvme-6.4 and gave it a bit of testing. Up to the last patch it seems to
> work fine, at least blktests doesn't trigger any errors.
> 
> I've tried to split the pure moving code around part from the part where we need
> to change some code. That means the last two patches highlight the problems I
> run into with this attempt to implement the setup_transport() callback

This should be perfectly fine covering loop as well. I think that
eventually it can cover pci as well, but we can promote it there in
time perhaps.