[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230504135053.2283816-1-dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 16:50:52 +0300
From: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
CC: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] virtio-vdpa: Fix unchecked call to NULL set_vq_affinity
The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is
valid. This patch adds the check.
Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism")
Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
index eb6aee8c06b2..989e2d7184ce 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
@@ -385,7 +385,9 @@ static int virtio_vdpa_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int nvqs,
err = PTR_ERR(vqs[i]);
goto err_setup_vq;
}
- ops->set_vq_affinity(vdpa, i, &masks[i]);
+
+ if (ops->set_vq_affinity)
+ ops->set_vq_affinity(vdpa, i, &masks[i]);
}
cb.callback = virtio_vdpa_config_cb;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists