[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230504142708.l4xo4sbl7wzsrbql@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 16:27:08 +0200
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: andreas@...al.se, jun.li@....com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] usb: typec: tcpci: clear the fault status bit
On 23-05-04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/4/23 06:46, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > According the "USB Type-C Port Controller Interface Specification v2.0"
> > the TCPC sets the fault status register bit-7
> > (AllRegistersResetToDefault) once the registers have been reseted to
>
> cleared ? set ?
Sry. I don't get this.
> > their default values.
> >
> > This triggers an alert(-irq) on PTN5110 devices albeit we do mask the
> > fault-irq. Fix this gernally by writing a one to the correspondig
>
> generically ?
Sure, thanks.
> corresponding
Of course!
> > bit-7.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c | 5 +++++
> > include/linux/usb/tcpci.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> > index 8da23240afbe..15632d023e4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> > @@ -602,6 +602,11 @@ static int tcpci_init(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
> > if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> > return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_FAULT_STATUS, ®);
>
> Needs error check.
I will add this.
> Also, I am not sure if this is the correct place for this code. The alert
> status is cleared after vendor initialization. Should the same be done
> here ?
According the spec the bit must be cleared before the TCPC_ALERT is
cleared. Of course the vendor-init can (re-)trigger the bit, therefore
we should move behind the vendor init and right before the TCPC_ALERT
clear.
> Also, why not just write the bit unconditionally, similar
> to TCPC_ALERT ?
Thought about this too.. I will change it in the v3.
Thanks for the feedback,
Marco
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> > + if (reg & TCPC_FAULT_STATUS_ALL_REG_RST_TO_DEFAULT)
> > + tcpci_write16(tcpci, TCPC_FAULT_STATUS,
> > + TCPC_FAULT_STATUS_ALL_REG_RST_TO_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > /* Handle vendor init */
> > if (tcpci->data->init) {
> > ret = tcpci->data->init(tcpci, tcpci->data);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/tcpci.h b/include/linux/usb/tcpci.h
> > index 85e95a3251d3..83376473ac76 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/usb/tcpci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/usb/tcpci.h
> > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
> > #define TCPC_POWER_STATUS_SINKING_VBUS BIT(0)
> > #define TCPC_FAULT_STATUS 0x1f
> > +#define TCPC_FAULT_STATUS_ALL_REG_RST_TO_DEFAULT BIT(7)
> > #define TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED 0x21
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists