linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Landlock support for UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4d1cfc8-6d50-57be-fd64-8c648acacaf5@digikod.net>
Date:   Thu, 4 May 2023 18:01:39 +0200
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>,
        kuba <kuba@...nel.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Ritesh Raj Sarraf <ritesh@...labora.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@...labora.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Landlock support for UML

Hi Richard, any news?

On 04/04/2023 15:52, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 21/03/2023 22:38, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>> Von: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@...ikod.net>
>>> Richard, Anton, Johannes, what do you think about these UML changes?
>>
>> I like them but didn't had a chance for a deeper look so far. :-S
> 
> Good! Do you think it could make it for v6.4?  Should we push it in
> -next for testing?
> 
> Thanks,
>    Mickaël