linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/6] Enable Cluster Scheduling for x86 Hybrid CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1683156492.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu,  4 May 2023 09:09:50 -0700
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V . Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
        Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Enable Cluster Scheduling for x86 Hybrid CPUs

Cluster scheduling domain is not enabled on x86 hybrid CPUs as the logic
is missing to do proper load balancing between a cluster
with SMT CPUs in single core and a cluster with multiple Atom CPUs.

When cluster scheduling was first introduced to x86, it was noticed
that with cluster scheduling on hybrid CPU, single threaded task often
ended up on Atom core (or E-core) instead on idle Big core (or P-core),
resulting in lower performance.  Hence cluster scheduling was disabled 
on x86 hybrid CPU.  (See: https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-516-regress)

Ricardo recently introduced a patch series that greatly improved
the load balancing logic between P-cores and E-cores on x86 hybrid
CPUs.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230429153219.GC1495785@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/T/#m16ebc8de64dbf4c54adebab701b42b47805105f4

However, that patch series is not enough to allow the enabling of cluster
scheduling on hybrid x86 CPUs.  This patch series provides some additional
fixes needed for load balancing between cluster sched group consisting
of SMT CPUs of Big cores and cluster sched group consisting of Atom CPUs.
With these patches applied on top of Ricardo's patch series, load is
properly balanced between the P-core and E-core clusters.  Idle CPUs
are used in the proper order:

1) SMT CPU on an idle P-core, 
2) idle E-core,
3) unused SMT CPU with a busy sibling.

On x86, CPUs in a cluster share L2 cache. Load is now balanced
between the clusters with cluster enabled, for potentially less L2 cache
contention.

I did some experiments on an Alder Lake with 6 P-cores and 8 E-cores,
organized in two clusters of 4 E-core each.

I tested some single threaded benchmarks in Phoronix suite that previously
have shown regressions when cluster scheduling was first enabled. Cluster
scheduling using this patch series performs as well as vanilla kernel.

Single Threaded	6.3-rc5 		with cluster 	Improvement
Benchmark				scheduling	in Performance
		(run-run deviation) 	
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tjbench		(+/- 0.08%)		(+/- 0.23%)	-0.23%
PhPbench	(+/- 0.31%)		(+/- 0.89%)	-0.39%
flac		(+/- 0.58%)		(+/- 0.22%)	+0.17%
pybench		(+/- 3.16%)		(+/- 0.27%)	+2.55%

For multi-threaded benchmarks, I tried kernel build and tensor flow lite.
Cluster scheduling did best for the 10 thread case where 6 threads run on
the P-cores, 2 threads on one Atom cluster and 2 threads on the other Atom
cluster. Whereas the vanilla kernel will have 6 threads on the P-cores,
4 threads on one Atom cluster.  Though the differences are small and
fall within run variations.

Multi Threaded	6.3-rc5 		with cluster 	Improvement
Benchmark				scheduling	in Performance
(-#threads)	(run-run deviation) 	
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kbuild-8	(+/- 2.90%)		(+/- 1.16%)	-0.76%
Kbuild-10	(+/- 3.08%)		(+/- 3.09%)	+0.64%
Kbuild-12	(+/- 3.28%)		(+/- 3.55%)	+0.91%
Tensor Lite-8	(+/- 4.84%)		(+/- 4.61%)	-0.23%
Tensor Lite-10	(+/- 0.87%)		(+/- 1.45%)	+0.47%
Tensor Lite-12	(+/- 1.37%)		(+/- 1.04%)	-0.12%

Thanks for reviewing these patches.

Tim Chen

Ricardo Neri (1):
  sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance

Tim C Chen (5):
  sched/topology: Propagate SMT flags when removing degenerate domain
  sched/fair: Check whether active load balance is needed in busiest
    group
  sched/fair: Fix busiest group selection for asym groups
  sched/fair: Skip prefer sibling move between SMT group and non-SMT
    group
  sched/x86: Add cluster topology to hybrid CPU

 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |  3 ++
 kernel/sched/fair.c       | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/topology.c   |  7 +++-
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0