[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgv1sKTdLWPC7XR1Px=pDNrDPDTKdX-T_2AQOwgkpWB2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 10:25:30 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Roman Lozko <lozko.roma@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: BPF skels in perf .Re: [GIT PULL] perf tools changes for v6.4
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 4:09 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
> Does building runqslower works for you in this same environment where
> building perf failed?
I don't know, and I don't care. I've never used that thing, and I'm
not going to.
And it's irrelevant. Two wrongs do not make a right.
I'm going to ignore perf tools pulls going forward if this is the kind
of argument for garbage that you use.
Because a billion flies *can* be wrong.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists