linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Fix missing adreno

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 May 2023 19:41:52 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:IOMMU SUBSYSTEM" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Fix missing adreno_smmu's



On 2.05.2023 18:09, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> 
> When the special handling of qcom,adreno-smmu was moved into
> qcom_smmu_create(), it was overlooked that we didn't have all the
> required entries in qcom_smmu_impl_of_match.  So we stopped getting
> adreno_smmu_priv on sc7180, breaking per-process pgtables.
> 
> Fixes: 30b912a03d91 ("iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create")
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
I believe the issue here is the lack of qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 instead.

qcom,adreno-smmu does not have to imply the "qcom smmu v2" impl

Konrad
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index d1b296b95c86..88c89424485b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -512,20 +512,25 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6115-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data},
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> +	/*
> +	 * Should come after the qcom,smmu-500 fallback so smmu-500 variants of
> +	 * adreno-smmu get qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl:
> +	 */
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,adreno-smmu", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  static struct acpi_platform_list qcom_acpi_platlist[] = {
>  	{ "LENOVO", "CB-01   ", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
>  	{ "QCOM  ", "QCOMEDK2", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  #endif