[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 09:13:20 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: st,stm32-rproc: Rework
reset declarations
On 04/05/2023 11:46, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> With the introduction of the SCMI (System Control and Management
> Interface), it is now possible to use the SCMI to handle the
> hold boot instead of a dedicated SMC call.
> additionalProperties: false
>
> examples:
> - |
> #include <dt-bindings/reset/stm32mp1-resets.h>
> - m4_rproc: m4@...00000 {
> + m4_rproc_example1: m4@...00000 {
Just drop the label. It's not used.
> compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4";
> reg = <0x10000000 0x40000>,
> <0x30000000 0x40000>,
> <0x38000000 0x10000>;
> resets = <&rcc MCU_R>;
> + reset-names = "mcu_rst";
> st,syscfg-holdboot = <&rcc 0x10C 0x1>;
> - st,syscfg-tz = <&rcc 0x000 0x1>;
> + st,syscfg-rsc-tbl = <&tamp 0x144 0xFFFFFFFF>;
> + st,syscfg-m4-state = <&tamp 0x148 0xFFFFFFFF>;
> + };
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/reset/stm32mp1-resets.h>
> + m4_rproc_example2: m4@...00000 {
Also here.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists