[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877ctnorkp.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 16:06:46 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wifi: ath11k: Use list_count_nodes()
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> writes:
> ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_vdevs() and ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_bcn() really
> look the same as list_count_nodes(), so use the latter instead of hand
> writing it.
>
> The first ones use list_for_each_entry() and the other list_for_each(), but
> they both count the number of nodes in the list.
>
> While at it, also remove to prototypes of non-existent functions.
> Based on the names and prototypes, it is likely that they should be
> equivalent to list_count_nodes().
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-tested
BTW I prefer to have "Compile tested only" in the commit log to make it
clear that it's not tested on a real device. So I added that sentence to
both this and ath10k patch.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists