linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 07/11] Documentation/hwmon: Revise sysfs interface specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 05 May 2023 09:10:43 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     James Seo <james@...iv.tech>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     James Seo <james@...iv.tech>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/11] Documentation/hwmon: Revise sysfs interface
 specification

James Seo <james@...iv.tech> writes:

> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:51:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 12:57:48AM -0700, James Seo wrote:
>>> +**RO**    Read-only value.
>>> +**WO**    Write-only value.
>>> +**RW**    Read/write value.
>> 
>> Why are the permissions be emphasized?
>
> I don't remember, to be honest. I will deemphasize permissions.

Just to say ... you are interacting with a personality known for driving
contributors into the ground with nit-picky comments.  We do lean toward
minimal markup, but this is not an example that really needed to be
called out.  Do whatever seems best to you here.

Thanks,

jon